Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
English | Español (España)
Editorial
Revistas / Journals
Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología Metaverse Basic and Applied Research Data & Metadata Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología - Serie de Conferencias Community and Interculturality in Dialogue Seminars in Medical Writing and Education Health Leadership and Quality of Life Gamification and Augmented Reality Southern perspective / Perspectiva austral
Home
Issue
Current Issue Previous Issues Special Issue
About
About the Journal Editorial Team Privacy Statement Digital preservation policy Contact
Submissions
Guidelines for authors Peer Review Process Open Access Policy and Copyright Ethical aspects Anti-plagiarism policy Crossmark Policy
Indexing
×
English | Español (España)
Editorial

Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología Metaverse Basic and Applied Research Data & Metadata Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología - Serie de Conferencias Community and Interculturality in Dialogue Seminars in Medical Writing and Education Health Leadership and Quality of Life Gamification and Augmented Reality Southern perspective / Perspectiva austral
Home

Current Issue Previous Issues Special Issue

About the Journal Editorial Team Privacy Statement Digital preservation policy Contact

Guidelines for authors Peer Review Process Open Access Policy and Copyright Ethical aspects Anti-plagiarism policy Crossmark Policy
Indexing
Systematic reviews or meta-analyses
Published: 2022-12-26
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56294/mr202217

Blockchain-based solutions for clinical trial data management: a systematic review

By
Wei Zhang ,
Wei Zhang

Qilu University of Technology, Jinan, China

Search this author on:

PubMed | Google Scholar

Abstract

Blockchain technology can reduce the need for intermediaries in various types of transactions by providing a decentralized and secure ledger that can be accessed and updated by all parties involved in the transaction. Clinical trials are essential for bringing new drugs and therapies to market, but the current clinical research process is often marred by inefficiencies, data inaccuracies, and a lack of transparency. The implementation of blockchain technology in clinical trials has the potential to address these challenges by providing a secure and transparent platform for data management. By leveraging the power of blockchain, healthcare providers can improve the integrity and accuracy of clinical trial data, enhance trust in the clinical research process, and ultimately improve patient outcomes. In this article, we propose the use of blockchain technology in clinical trials and explore its potential benefits for the healthcare. The implementation of a blockchain-based data management system for clinical trials holds significant potential to address several challenges associated with the current clinical research process. By improving the integrity and security of medical data, enhancing trust, and easing regulatory burden, such a system can promote the efficient and effective conduct of clinical trials. The adoption of a blockchain-based solution for clinical trial data management has the potential to optimize costs, contributing to the sustainability of healthcare services. It also provides a model for future research and development of blockchain-based solutions in the field of clinical research.

Keywords:

Blockchain,
Blockchain technology,
Clinical trials,
Health,

How to Cite

1.
Zhang W. Blockchain-based solutions for clinical trial data management: a systematic review. Metaverse Basic and Applied Research [Internet]. 2022 Dec. 26 [cited 2024 Jul. 27];1:17. Available from: https://mr.saludcyt.ar/index.php/mr/article/view/17

Copyright Notice

The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Vol. 1 (2022)
See full issue

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.